Feature headline
WTR, also affectionately know as "Wart Hog Ridge" or "White Elephant Ridge" by local residents, has resurfaced. For those not familiar with the founding of the MMRA, this was the original "cause" that got us in motion.

Back to Development top level

Town Documents page - Documents published by the town on WTR

How council has voted on WTR - A one by one list of votes

WTR Site Plans - See how WTR has evolved over time, and analysis

WTR EA Process

A phase 1 & 2 report was published by the developer .

More info here.

WTR EA Technical Advisory Committee

Has been set up bu the town and developer. For more information contac the town director of public works Tim Kocialek at 256-2064 ext 233 or tkocialek@mississippimills.ca

May 2005 - Get the TAC Project File info here.

Get your online copy of the EA Phase 1 & 2 report (Dec 2004) here!

The main info page on WTR is here.

New Council Passes motion in support of WTR

2004-Mar-09

The following motion was passed by council on Tuesday March 9th 2004:

11. BE IT RESOLVED THAT the Council of the Corporation of the Town of Mississippi Mills supports the White Tail Ridge red-lined subdivision layout dated February 20, 2004.

AND FURTHERMORE THAT there be no changes to the conditions of draft approval for this subdivision as approved February 11, 2003 and refined November 6, 2003.

AND FURTHERMORE THAT, this position be conveyed to the County of Lanark Planning Approvals Department.

This is a highly disappointing result!

....given the statements made by councillors during the fall 2003 election campaign.

To see how councillors voted, see this page.

What is a Hamlet Style Subdivision?

See this page for modern planning concepts, including design of small communities.

Of note, on this page are excerpts from the book "Vision for a New America Dream" by Anton Clarence Nelessen. We're not America, but many of the concepts are very applicable.

Also see the WTR Site Plans page for comparison and analysis.

New Site Plan Presented to Council

Feb. 17 2004

At the Feb. 17 P&E Meeting Council discussed the newly revised site plan.

Some initial comments:

There are still 175 lots. There is still a "ring road" around the development. 9 lots that used to back onto the park have been relocated so that the park is more exposed to the road. The park is still the same size (about 8-9 acres but the water & sewer processes are located within this park). There is now about 750-850 feet of the park that opens to the street. Some other lots on the site plan have been reduced in size from 1800 square metres to 1000 square metres (presumably to reorganize the park frontage).

Special Council Meeting on WTR

Feb. 2nd 2004

Given the decision of Council to open for review the WTR draft conditions and draft subdivision plan, there was a special Council meeting on Feb. 2nd to discuss the way forward.

The need for this meeting was discussed at the Jan. 27 P&E Meeting. Some notes concerning WTR from that meeting are below.

WTR at the P&E Meeting

Jan. 27 2004

Council is seeking legal advice to ascertain whether the prior commitments (made by last Council) on the WTR site plan are binding.

There was discussion to make some design changes. For example: the central park, a central "main street", the one entrance, hamlet style subdivision requirements.

Councillors also requested that legal advice / opinion be sought on the compliance of the WTR site plan to the Ramsay OP. There was debate here. Notably, Ed Wilson, Jim Lowry & John Levi thought the current site plan design did comply, but John Edwards, Alex Gillis Val Wilkinson, and Jane Torrance spoke strongly to revisit the design and thought it didn't comply. The split on Council over this issue is evident with other Councillors taking the obvious sides.

Also, the WTR developer had asked the town (see below) to schedule the needed zoning by-law amendment (ZBA) as soon as possible. The general feeling seemed to be that the other questions (above) need to be sorted out before the zoning bylaw amendment proceeds.

Alex Gillis questioned the developer's belief that the EA process runs concurrently with his progressing development. Alex would like to know more about the timing.. i.e. Doesn't the EA need to answer some questions before the developer forges ahead.

Small bore and the number of units it can support is still being left up to the EA to decide, as is the environmental impact of its drainage system.

So... a few Councillors (that slight minority), think the delays on the WTR development are just a waste of time and that only a minority of residents care about making WTR the best it can be.

WTR Zoning Bylaw to be Considered

Jan. 27 2004

The developer is wanting to push ahead with the zoning bylaw as soon as possible. Part of the Jan. 27 P&E Meeting information package is this email discussing the bylaw.

Wonder what the developer means by "future phases"?

Council passes Motion to Defer the Draft Conditions at County

Jan. 20 2004
Council passed a motion last night to defer the tabling of the WTR draft conditions at the County Council for 60 days. This will give time for the new MM Council to review the draft conditions as approved by the old Council.

There are a number of concerns some Councillors have, and many in the community share these concerns. The councillors main discussions about why it should be deferred were about (at least what I think I was hearing):

  • the fact that WTR was not a Hamlet style design (this was the main reason, I think)
  • the EA process should adequately take care of technical unknowns about the communal servicing
  • What are the long term implications of owning Communal servicing (legal, financial)?
  • The exact number of lots on the site

The vote was evenly split, with Mayor Al breaking the tie to pass the motion. Councillors Anderson, Edwards, Gillis, Torrance, & Wilkinson voted for the deferral.

What next? This gives the current Council an opportunity to investigate and address the numerous concerns. Hopefully it isn't too difficult to come to a consensus on any changes to the WTR draft conditions.

Anyway, thanks to those Councillors that worked hard to make it happen, and then voted to back it up!

Developer Threatens OMB Action

Jan. 15 2004
In a letter to the Town, the developer R.J. Connelly indicated that he would be taking the town to the OMB if the Council passes the motion to delay the Draft Conditions. This letter was presented to Council for the Jan. 20th Council meeting.

Read the letter here.

White Tail Ridge - the Finale?

Jan. 19th 2004

It appears that a crucial vote is being held on WTR at the upcoming Council meeting on Jan. 20th. Please read on.

Why is this coming back now?

The old council rammed through the WTR draft conditions on Nov. 6th, 2003, a few days before the election of Nov. 10th. These draft conditions were sub-par. Councillors Anderson, Gillis and Rogers fought to let the next Council decide the issue, but were unsuccessful.

Some of our Current Council would like to revisit the draft conditions, because they feel that the draft conditions do not meet the Ramsay Official Plan, and that important new information has come forward.

See this document for further details.

Small Bore Servicing Presentation

Jan. 12, 2004

Roads & Public Works Meeting

The developer is at council again, giving the following presentation.

One of the things of interest is that it is now breaking out the small bore system from the actual sewage treatment and water supply. There are actually three components that are being proposed here:

  • a small bore sewage transport system from the homes to the sewage plant
  • a communal sewage treatment plant facility
  • a communal water treatment plant and delivery system

Remember, the Town MUST assume ownership of the sewage and water treatment facilities.

P&E Committed Asks the Town Planner for a WTR Status Report

Jan. 5 2004:

The new (post election) Planning and Economic Committee has asked the town planner for a current status and a time line for this project since inception. The Planners report from the town's perspective is available here.

The old council RAMS through the WTR Draft plan!

November 2003

This allows it to proceed on communal services instead of town sewer and water. Three councillors stood against the rest (Anderson, Gillis, Rogers), realising that this decision is not based on enough information and that it should be left to the new council (the election is just days away!).

Why communal services? Because the town has essentially no capacity left in the sewage lagoon system. The TROW Septage business case study (Appendices here) indicates maybe 1000 more persons can be handled> However, this number is based only on one parameter (Phosphorous), and we feel the report is rudimentary at best.

Even so, by provincial law that capacity must be reserved for servicing any possible development within the Almonte ward - see the Provincial document D-5-1, "Calculating and Reporting Uncommitted Reserve Capacity at Sewage and Water Treatment Plants.". 1000 persons is about 400 houses, and that doesn't include business and industrial development that is possible within the boundaries of Almonte proper.

So as an alternative to keep this project alive, the WTR draft conditions were amended to allow Communal Services to be used instead of town sewer & water. Due to the efforts of councillors Gillis, Rogers, and Anderson, the stipulation of the number of lots (152) was removed and replaced by a statement that the final number will be determined by an environmental assessment and subject to approval of council. We're not entirely sure this is any better though. The same three councillors tried unsuccessfully to defer the whole thing to the new council, based on the lack of information on the communal system and the 11th hour of the current council term (less than one week away). A valiant effort, but to no avail. Kudos to them for trying! As a side note, two out of these three got re-elected (Anderson & Gillis).

Developer's Presentation on SBS to Council

August 28 2003

Below is a copy of the developers presentation to council about the Small Bore System (SBS).

To us this misses the point of the sewage treatment completely. The SBS transports the sewage to the treatment facility. It's the treatment facility that is the issue. Do we really need another sewage treatment plant in Mississippi Mills?

Here is a PDF version (1 MB) which doesn't have the developers talking points for each slide

Here is the full Power Point presentation (3.2 MB) with all the talking points.

July 17th 2003

WTR Rears it's Head Again!

There was a public "information meeting" on July 29th at 7:05pm. The developer Richard (Dick) Connelly presented a "Servicing Options Statement" in an attempt to justify the development proposal.

Note that a "report" is required, but the developer submitted a "statement". One would assume that this is a subset of what is actually required. Wonder why?

Golf course? Read the fine print on the bottom of the page. "White Tail Ridge Golf Community" Is this the developer's "master plan" that the public knows nothing about (yet)?

Interesting, given the recent sewer and water capacity issues reported elsewhere on this site in regards to the town of Almonte's lagoons. See the notice below for more information. More will be posted as it becomes available.

July 29th P&E Committee Public information Meeting Notice

A Biography of the developer R.W. (Dick) Connelly can be found HERE.

Servicing Options Statement (July 2003)

as presented by the developer on July 29th is available here.

May 27, 2003

White Tail Ridge zoning bylaw put on the shelf

At the May 27th Planning and Economic Committee Meeting, the town planner stated that since there is no Almonte OP amendment with regard to sewer and water in progress, the passing of the zoning bylaw would contravene the Planning Act. This coincides with our previously published position paper on the issue.

May 2, 2003

White Tail Ridge - Still Ongoing

Even though the town's proposed Almonte Official Plan amendment to allow water and sewer to be brought outside of the Almonte urban area boundary was rejected by the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing (see below), the town is still proceeding with the zoning bylaw amendment.

Copy of the proposed Zoning Bylaw Amendment

The public meeting is for May 27th.

The MMRA feels that since there is no Almonte OP amendment in the works to allow sewer and water to be brought out to WTR, the passing of the zoning bylaw would contravene the Planning Act.

Read the MMRA Position Paper Here

Letter to Council - PDF

Letter to Council - RTF

This is a "form" letter from the keyboard of Julie Yeaman that opposes the new proposed development of White Tail Ridge. You can print it out and send to council as is.

The second link is to a Microsoft Word RTF format file that you can feel free to modify prior to sending it.

General Analysis - Long

Post Nov. 14 2002 Meeting Revision by Stewart Yeaman

This analysis of various issues concerning this development were thoughtfully put together by Stewart and Julie Yeaman. The topics listed below are discussed in detail, and this document forms the basis for individual sections listed in the links table to the far left.

The first link is to a 6 pager that goes into quite some detail. The second link is a revision based on the Public information meeting.

White Tail Ridge information at the Town of Mississippi Mills web site. Link to information officially published by the Town of Mississippi Mills. Please note that the MMRA questions the validity of many of the statements made on this site.
Notes by Jill McCubbin

Notes by Brendan Gawn

Official Minutes

Official Plan Steering Committee Meeting

Dec. 9th 2002

Planning Meeting Notice

Link to MP3 File of CBC Radio Report

Link to text on CBC Radio web site

Planning Committee Meeting

Council Chambers

5pm Tues. Nov. 26, 2002

Map of WTR Site

Presentation by Julie Yeaman

Post Meeting Analysis by Stewart Yeaman

Public Information Meeting

Thursday Nov. 14 2002

7pm - Miss. Mills Council Chambers

The house was packed with concerned residents!

First Council Meeting addressing this issue -

Sept. 24th 2002

This was a raucous affair. I think all were surprised by the intensity of the opposition to the proposed development.

We believe that council was ready to pass the application - until a large number of residents showed up!

The Tip of the (Non) Planning Iceberg

Mississippi Mills Council is attempting to approve a multi-home subdivision that will house about 700 (161x4.4) people within a very small area on Martin St. North. (~1.6 Km N. of Almonte, towards Blakeney - see map in the Public Meetings section). This development, the White-Tail Ridge (WTR for short) proposal, benefits none but the developer.

The ramifications of accepting such a project are monstrous. Some of the consequences are:

  • over-extended public sewage and water services. It is highly-questionable whether our current lagoon would work effectively (already a question without this increase of users!).
  • A precedent set for future un-researched, poorly planned developments. If this development proceeds, then the entire Official Plan process is compromised. If the law can be flouted once, it will be flouted at whim.
  • A huge increase in commuter traffic. The sub-division plans only ONE entry/exit (safety hazard). Traffic along Martin and Ottawa streets will increase by thousands of drives per day.
  • The erosion of the rural quality of our town.
  • Schooling issues
  • Increased taxes and, likely, tax money taken from present commitments and diverted to non-priority developments.

The above are just a few of the issues. There are few benefits. (See alternatives below.)

Our town Council appears to be showing a great lack of vision.

What of plans to expand youth or community services for these extra citizens (or current ones)? What of maintaining our downtown core as the hub of activity? What about environmental destruction, concerns & costs?

Council is not considering long term commitments.

And there are alternatives!

There are many lots and areas already slotted for development within the entire Mississippi Mills region. Many of these well-planned spaces have been identified within Almonte itself. Lets have growth in a structured, sensible way. If growth is on the agenda, Mississippi Mills should grow in a mature, sustainable, commendable way. Traffic congestion can be spread across the municipality, and new comers encouraged to participate in all aspects of our town (not just the strip to the highway). Environmental and social considerations should also be priorities. Poor planning & growth affects everyone who has chosen or will choose the town of Mississippi Mills for there home.

Why do you live here? What is important to you?

The next time the Official Plan is ignored - will it be next to you?

And a further point:

Mississippi Mills is about to adopt a New Official Town Plan that will be the legal document that governs all growth & planning issues (and others) in our town. The Proposed New Town Plan is presently under the microscope. Currently our town is governed by the existing Ramsay Official Plan (ROP) and the Almonte Official Plan (AOP). Council is hoping to accept the White Tail Ridge proposal although it legally contradicts both these plans. And the new OP is not even in effect yet! Accepting poor planning and such precedents will contribute to making the new OP ineffectual.

"Constant vigilance by ratepayers, outspoken participation, and informed decision making are required at this point in our town's history."

By Jill McCubbin